Jigsaw Puzzle technique vs. traditional group work: academic performance and satisfaction of the university students

Autores/as

  • Noelia González-Gálvez Group for the Prevention of Injuries in Sport (PRELEDE), Facultad de Deporte, UCAM Universidad Católica de Murcia, Campus de los Jerónimos
  • Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal Universidad Católica San Antonio (UCAM), España
  • Pablo Jorge Marcos-Pardo Department of Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Almería

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12800/ccd.v18i58.2034

Resumen

Alternative learning methods such as the Jigsaw Puzzle (JP) technique have gained prominence over traditional teaching
to promote the acquisition of skills in Higher Education. The aim of this research was to compare the academic
performance and satisfaction of students depending on whether the JP technique or traditional group work was
used. This is a cross-sectional study that involved 61 students in their 2nd year of the Degree in Physical Activity and
Sport Sciences (20.11 ± 0.43 years). In one class group, the JP technique was applied (n = 29), while the traditional technique was used in the other group (n = 32). After the end of the workshop, the grade and the degree of satisfaction
obtained with the techniques used were evaluated. The JP group obtained a grade (X = 8.52; SD = 0.5) and a degree
of satisfaction (X = 7.28; SD = 1.5) which were significantly higher than the traditional group (rating: X = 5.58; SD =
0.6; satisfaction: X = 6.34; SD = 1.6) (p ˂ .001 and p = .023, respectively). A correlation was found between grade and
satisfaction (ICC = .360; p = .004). In conclusion, conducting a one-off session based on the JP technique versus using a
traditional technique yields better grades and greater satisfaction with the teaching-learning process.

Publicado

2023-12-26

Cómo citar

González-Gálvez, N., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., & Marcos-Pardo, P. J. (2023). Jigsaw Puzzle technique vs. traditional group work: academic performance and satisfaction of the university students. Cultura, Ciencia Y Deporte, 18(58). https://doi.org/10.12800/ccd.v18i58.2034

Número

Sección

Artículos / Articles

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a